With all members in attendance, the meeting went smoothly.  The Election Commission is still overpaying on the water bill at Brandywine.  The County, as leaseholder, is supposed to take care of changing this, but Mr. O'Connor has not yet met with the landlord.  Director Tom Bride will bring this up to the County Adminstrator when he meets with him soon.  The new Election Commission website should be up and running since Friday, December 15.  It is using the same platform as Peoria County.
            Three Peoria polling places might be changing.  Northwoods Community Church no longer wishes to be a polling place.  Unless they change their minds, precinct 92 will vote to the North Branch Library, and precincts 91 and 94 will move to Prayerview Church on Wilhelm Rd. 
            Candidate filing for local primary races went smoothly without any objections.  Software for the pollbooks is being upgraded.  And the State's Attorney's office is working on tax exemption for the Brandywine property.
            Chairman Cummins expressed concern about the LWV website review which downgraded the Election Commission site because it was difficult to find the dates of meetings.  Director Bride explained that the new website should be more user friendly.
 Respectfully submitted,
Irene Pritzker

​By Lowell (Bud) Grieves
  
Re. Nov. 25 Forum letter by Doug Johnson, “Why should private company own Peoria’s water?”:
I want to take this opportunity to clarify a statement made in the above letter that when mayor I was personally offered $50,000 to make the water buyout issue disappear. The facts are that shortly after my taking office in 1997, water company executives met privately with me concerning the 1889 option granting the city the option every five years to purchase the water company. Their contention was that this option, because of its age and other factors, was no longer valid. They urged me to meet with the council and get them to approve the city’s dissolution of this contract.
They also stated that they were willing to pay the city $50,000 to end this “nuisance” issue for both parties. To their great credit, the council refused, and bolstered by a group of community-minded citizens who provided the funds for a legal challenge, the city went to court to prove the validity of this option. In 2002, after a five-year legal battle, the courts ruled in the city’s favor to uphold the 1889 franchise agreement, forcing the water company to participate in the city’s process of exploring a buyout every five years.
Establishment of the validity of this option is now a very valuable tool for the city, and one I am glad we did not relinquish for $50,000
Lowell (Bud) Grieves
Former Peoria mayor
Canton

By Couri Thomas
Posted Dec 2, 2017 at 7:08 PM
  
The Illinois Black Chamber of Commerce and its members are an important part of our community. Executive Director Larry Ivory deserves to be heard and respected. However, his recent Spotlight letter opposing public ownership of the Peoria water system simply echoes the arguments made by Illinois American Water Co.

Mr. Ivory expressed concerns about “loss of jobs, charitable contributions and economic development, as well as higher rates and fewer infrastructure upgrades that put water at risk.” As the saying goes, “There are two sides to every story.”
Some facts:
1. There is no reason to believe there will be a loss of jobs. When the city considered public ownership in 2005, the planning was based on the same labor force used by Illinois American.
2. Recently, IAWC has been more aggressive with charitable contributions, but where does that money come from? It comes, of course, from local ratepayers — us. IAWC returns a small portion of its remarkable profits in the form of charitable contributions with the expectation it can continue charging ever-higher rates. Peorians should not fall for this sort of flimflam.
3. Communities that own their water systems have greater flexibility to support economic development, as we’ve seen in East Peoria, Washington, Peoria Heights and Morton. It is ironic that much of East Peoria’s retail development is supported by Peorians, especially those from the older parts of the city.
4. Peorians pay about twice the national average for water, over $600 per year. For many low-income Peorians, that extra $300 would be very welcome .
5. IAWC claims to have spent over $150 million upgrading Peoria’s water system. The other side of that claim is that IAWC is allowed to make a 7.47 percent return on those investments — more than $11 million in extra profit. Under public ownership, that $11 million could be kept in Peoria to do good things for Peorians, not to enrich a New Jersey corporation.

Mr. Ivory also argues that the city can’t afford to investigate the purchase of the water company. He does not consider the possibility that Peoria’s business leaders might pay for that appraisal. Such an offer is in the works to relieve the city of this expense.

Public ownership of the water system is really about money and transparency. IAWC desperately wants to protect the $58 million in income it takes annually from the rate zone that includes Peoria. Think of what Peorians could do to improve our city if just a fraction of that sum remained under local control.

IAWC doesn’t want Peorians to know its profits, how much money is being shipped out of state, the benefits of a public system, or the potential cost of the water system. Peorians deserve to know those answers. I urge the City Council to get the facts and share them with the public.

Couri Thomas is warehouse supervisor at Peoria Area Food Bank. He was a candidate for Peoria mayor earlier this year.

​